Turkey could abandon secularism with new religious constitution

Turkey could abandon secularism with new religious constitution
Turkey's parliament speaker has advocated a constitution based on religion, a major shift from almost a century of state-sanctioned secularism.
2 min read
26 April, 2016
Turkey is ruled by the moderate Islamist AKP party [AFP]
Turkey should have a new constitution based on religious principles, parliament speaker Ismail Kahraman said Monday.

"As a Muslim country, why should we be in a situation where we are in retreat from religion?" state-run news agency Anatolia quoted him as saying.

"We are a Muslim country. As a consequence, we must have a religious constitution," the ruling Justice and Development Party [AKP] lawmaker told a conference in Istanbul.

"Secularism cannot feature in the new constitution."

Critics accuse President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's Islamic-rooted AKP of eroding the secular values laid by modern Turkey's founder Mustafa Kemal Ataturk since it took power in 2002.

Over the past two years, the government has lifted bans on women and girls wearing headscarves in schools and civil service.

It also limited alcohol sales and made efforts to ban mixed-sex dorms at state universities.

Kemal Kilicdaroglu, the head of Turkey's opposition secular Republican People's Party [CHP], slammed the speaker's comments.

"The chaos that reigns in the Middle East is the product of ways of thinking that, like you, make religion an instrument of politics," Kilicdaroglu wrote on Twitter.

"Secularism exists so everyone can practise their religion freely, Mr Kahraman!"

Since the AKP's re-election in November, the government has said it wants to prioritise replacing Turkey's constitution, inherited from a military junta after a coup in 1980.

Several rounds of negotiations have failed - most recently in February - with the opposition rejecting the increasingly powerful role of the presidency under Erdogan.

Kahraman backed a "presidential system" for Turkey, and rejected claims that this would push the country towards authoritarianism.

"Some people say that (a strengthened presidency) means dictatorship," he said. "Where is this link? Is (US President Barack) Obama a dictator?"